Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Junkie! The Politics of Language

Recently I have seen the word “junkie” thrown around a lot by people. Junkie is one of those words loaded with connotations. It is a slur, used derogatorily by non-addicts to label people who have addiction issues. This label is used to categorize people on the social spectrum. Categorization of people into different labels and groups isn't anything that will be going away soon. The process of categorization allows us simplify and organize our perceptions of the world around us. This is essential for understanding our own place within our surroundings. Social stigma is the process that links a negative attribute to a social identity. For instance, the word “slut” is a stigma used against women who are deemed “overly promiscuous”. “Junkie” is no different. Stigmatized groups range across the spectrum – women, ethnic or racial minorities, LGBT, people with disabilities, economically disadvantages, and many others have all been faced with varying degrees of oppression.

Drug addiction has been a hot button issue lately. We see it appearing in the newspaper nearly everyday and it has entered in the public discourse more and more. Just recently we have begun to see the overall acceptance of drug addiction as a disease rather than a moral deficiency. One that requires a healthcare solution, not just a law-and-order one. For the first time in history, drug addicts both in recovery and active have been coming out of the woodwork and making their voices heard. For a long time people who suffered from addiction hid behind the veil of anonymity, because coming forward would mean facing social stigma and often times incarceration. Today that is not necessarily the case. Marty Walsh was elected Mayor of Boston despite identifying as an alcoholic in recovery, Chris Herren (the ex-Boston Celtic player) has come forward as an an addict in recovery, and a host of others from Hollywood to our neighborhood. 


From L to R; Chris Herren, Mayor Walsh, Philip Seymour Hoffman


This “coming out” marks the turning point for addiction advocacy. The same way people in the LGBT community came out publicly about sexuality. This is a crucial way to humanize our identities and the reclaim our status as deserving members of the community. When people who are not addicts use the word “junkie” to describe a human being, it sets us back to the past where we were considered less than human, undeserving, and outside of society. Our community needs to be mindful of the language we use. As distinguished anthropologist Edward Sapir notes, “With language we categorize, distinguish, and create the universe. Ultimately, we perceive the world according to our language.” This means that words are not empty. In fact our language constructs our reality. When we come across people who refer to us as “junkies”, it is because they do not value us as human beings either consciously or unconsciously. History has shown us that “our kind” are not welcome. The best way to combat this perception is to show them who we are. We live among you, we are your landscapers, baristas, lawyers, babysitters, teachers, and your politicians. The next time you have a conversation about addiction be conscious of the language used, if we can transform how we talk about addiction we can transform how we treat it.


Sincerely,
Nate Robertson, Your Local Junkie
PS. I better not catch you calling me that

Thursday, January 15, 2015

In Regards to the Protests on I-93

I'm all for radical reform in this country. I'm all for protest and civil disobedience. However, deliberately hijacking and gridlocking the infrastructure of a major city during rush hour is insane and counterproductive.

According to the state police, at least five ambulances had to be diverted this morning. One had a passenger with life threatening injuries that had to be diverted from a level one trauma center in Boston to a less capable facility in Brockton. Clearly this is not the mere inconvenience that the protesters were hoping to unleash. This is dangerous towards innocent people and calls into question the morality of the cause that these protesters are backing.

As for the "inconvenience" aspect of all of this, yes, I'm sure it was quite an inconvenience to those sitting in traffic for up to five hours this morning. The people most inconvenienced by it were surely those non-salary, working class commuters who missed half a day's pay. The same people that the misguided, privileged college kids protesting claim to be standing up for.

Black lives do matter, and the world must change, but this is not how to get people on your side. This is martyrdom for the sake of martyrdom. When your "movement" loses steam and popular support, don't dare to point the fingers at anyone but your organizers.